Have you ever experienced being approached by a law enforcement officer while walking on the street? Were you ever subjected to a search for potential illegal items due to their suspicions? Interestingly, this practice is permitted under a law in New York City known as stop and frisk. However, it raises concerns regarding its impact on the younger generation and the communities they belong to. This practice seems to contradict the fourth amendment of the U.S. constitution, which safeguards citizens from unjustified searches and seizures. Consequently, this has become a contentious topic in the realm of mass media.
In the landmark case of Terry vs. Ohio in 1968, the term “stop and frisk” originated. This occurred when a police officer noticed three individuals behaving suspiciously outside a jewelry store and suspected them of being involved in a robbery. The officer approached the men and conducted a frisk, discovering that they were carrying a weapon. Terry, the defendant, argued that this search violated his fourth amendment rights. However, the Supreme Court sided with the police, recognizing the need for officers to address potentially dangerous situations that could endanger their lives and the lives of others. Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the state, granting officers the authority to stop individuals if they have reasonable suspicion of an ongoing crime. It is important to note that the stop and frisk policy did not come into effect until 2002.
The practice of unfairly targeting young men, particularly those of color, is considered biased and has raised concerns about racial profiling and individual privacy. According to a report from the NYPD, approximately 90% of people stopped and frisked in 2011 were African-American or Hispanic. Additionally, a study conducted by the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) reveals that since 2002, New Yorkers have been stopped and questioned over 4 million times. Despite the majority of individuals from black and Latino communities being innocent, they continue to be disproportionately targeted.
The police unfairly target minorities, resulting in a detrimental impact on the youth’s mindset. Nicholas Peart, a college graduate working for a nonprofit in Harlem, has experienced the stop and frisk practice numerous times, to the extent that he cannot recall the exact number. In a brief video, he describes it as a common occurrence for black and brown boys in various neighborhoods across the city. Another victim, David Ourlicht, who is preparing for law school, believes that this practice fosters a sense of mistrust within the community. It is evident that these unjust practices by the police department are negatively affecting young individuals and causing harm to communities.
The primary role of the police force is to safeguard citizens from all forms of violence. However, it is unfortunate that they are misusing their authority, particularly targeting minority groups and making their lives more challenging. Fratello and Rengifo, two researchers, conducted a study in the city’s most heavily patrolled neighborhoods to examine the consequences of stop and frisk practices in New York. Gathering information and data proved to be challenging as people were hesitant to discuss their encounters with the police due to discomfort. Nevertheless, the researchers altered their approach, aiming to create a comfortable environment for individuals to share their experiences. Despite the obstacles faced, the study revealed the significant impact of this practice on young individuals.
The revelation that the majority of individuals aged 13 to 25 have experienced frequent stops by the police and have completely lost faith in the NYPD is truly shocking. According to the report, a staggering 88 percent of young people believe that their neighborhood residents do not trust the police, and only 4 in 10 respondents would feel comfortable seeking help from law enforcement if they were in trouble. Furthermore, those who have been subjected to more frequent stops in the past are less likely to report crimes, even when they themselves are the victims. It is truly tragic that the aggressive tactics employed by the police have eroded the trust of young people, further marginalizing already vulnerable communities.
Police officers frequently use excessive force against young Blacks and Latinos during stops, treating them as criminals and instilling feelings of inferiority. Mayor Bloomberg has consistently defended this practice, asserting its importance in reducing crime rates, despite the fact that weapons were found in only 1% of all stops. However, there is no concrete evidence to support the claim that this practice has effectively reduced shootings or crime rates, as reported by PolicyMic. This policy has garnered significant media attention and sparked debates regarding its detrimental psychological effects on young Black and Latino communities.
Unfortunately, the reality is that the authorities harbor racist beliefs towards African Americans, labeling them as “criminals”. In the book Black Metropolis, the author highlights the fear that people have towards African Americans. Nevertheless, some African Americans manage to improve their living conditions and relocate from disadvantaged areas to predominantly white neighborhoods, as described by Drake. However, this influx of African Americans into these neighborhoods often leads Caucasian residents to leave, as they are unwilling to live alongside Black individuals. Consequently, it becomes more challenging for African Americans to integrate with other societal groups. Disturbingly, the government contributes to these racist perceptions by enacting policies like stop and frisk, which disproportionately target specific racial groups. This serves as evidence that racism persists in America and is not merely a relic of the past. Social inequalities continue to plague society, and it is insufficient to merely address these issues individually; collective action is necessary to bring about meaningful change.
Reference List:
1. http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/05/us/new-york-stop-and-frisk/
2. http://www.nyclu.org/issues/racial-justice/stop-and-frisk-practices
3. http://justpublics365.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2013/10/23/effects-of-stop-and-frisk/
4. http://www.policymic.com/articles/9914/stop-and-frisk-law-is-racist-and-the-shame-of-new-york-city
5. .”>”Hunter College Libraries.” Databases Login. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2013..”>
Copyright © 2018 Lucky Begum All Rights Reserved.
